In " The Ethics of Climate Change." John Broome shows the side of climate change many of us forget about. The ethical decision behind it. It is said that is it good to live in the present, but in this case is it better to live in the future? We are so concerned with living comfortably now, that our resources have basically been used up. Leaving the people of our world community in 50 or 40 years with nothing to sustain them.
So how do we fix this? Either we find unlimted resources for our future or stop the way we live and slow down Humanity's suicide. But Change takes unity. Change takes time. And Change takes money. All these things we don't have and don't have time for. We need to act now and act quick so our future can sustain itself, so the endless battle of moratality can be sustained.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I completely agree...in fact my paper is based on a pretty similar topic, haha.
ReplyDeleteI think we just need to get used to the idea that we can't have everything we want at the very second we want it. We might have to make sacrifices now in order to save our environment, but in the long run it'll be worth it. If for no other reason, we should be concerned for our future families. It'd just be mean if we said we didn't care about them! That's not cool! haha.